Walk into any AI PM interview knowing exactly what the hiring manager is scoring, and give them the answer they're looking for every time
For product managers and aspiring PMs at any level who want to crack the AI PM interview loop at top-tier companies and walk out with an offer, not a rejection.
9 chapters, 63 lessons
14-day refund on the yearly plan. Real pricing on the plans page, no surprises.
63
lessons, yours to run
Easy to pick up, built to get you the next job
No coding background needed, and you write code with Claude as you go.
Every section below turns into something a hiring manager recognises, not just notes.
Own the scorecard before you open your mouth
- You'll decode the five-column rubric hiring managers fill in for every answer, so every sentence you say hits a specific column rather than hoping someone connects the dots.
- You'll practise scoring your own answers 1 to 4 on product thinking, AI depth, metrics rigour, communication, and safety judgement, so you know exactly where you stand before the real loop.
- No prior technical background needed: the course builds from first principles so you're never lost, and the scoring framework works regardless of your background.
Speak AI fluently enough to impress an engineering-heavy panel
- You'll attach a real tradeoff and a product decision to tokens, context windows, temperature, and hallucinations, the way a hiring manager at a frontier lab actually wants to hear it.
- You'll explain when to reach for RAG versus fine-tuning versus an agent, and say why not the alternative, which is the sentence that separates the one hire from the nine rejections.
- Plain English throughout: every technical concept is taught as a product decision first, with no assumed coding or ML background.
Answer the 50 real questions top labs actually ask
- You'll work through real questions asked at OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Google, Microsoft, and others, using a repeatable framework so you never blank.
- You'll learn the traps that sink average candidates on product sense, strategy, execution, and behavioural rounds, and exactly how to sidestep them.
- Every framework is something a hiring manager would recognise as senior PM thinking, not abstract theory.
Nail the take-home and practical rounds that most candidates underestimate
- You'll build your answer to take-home and practical assignments using the same five-column scorecard lens, so your written work reads like someone who already works there.
- You'll practise safety judgement on real AI failure scenarios, the dimension that separates a 2025 PM candidate from a 2019 one in the eyes of any frontier lab.
Finish this course and you can do all of this, no prior background required:
- You'll be able to decode any AI PM interview question by identifying which scorecard column it tests and aim your answer at that column from the first sentence, which is exactly the discipline hiring
- You'll be able to explain the product implications of tokens, context windows, temperature, hallucinations, RAG, fine-tuning, RLHF, evals, inference, and agents, each with a real tradeoff and a real n
- You'll be able to work through any design, strategy, or execution question using a repeatable framework that produces a structured, metric-grounded, safety-aware answer every time, no blanking, no ram
- You'll be able to answer the take-home and practical rounds with the same rigour as the live rounds, because you'll know what the written rubric is testing and how to show it on the page.
- You'll be able to handle safety and ethics questions with the depth a 2025 AI PM hire needs, designing failure cases and guardrails as naturally as the feature itself, which is now a deciding column i
- You'll be able to walk into a debrief where your advocate in the room has at least one concrete, above-the-bar moment to argue for you, because the course trains you to land that moment deliberately,
63 lessons, 9 chapters
Built by practitioners, not influencers
Every agent, skill file, and dataset is drawn from 25+ years and 50+ Oracle ERP implementations across pharma, manufacturing, semiconductor, and distribution.
Kept current with the stack
Claude Code, skills, and MCP move fast. Your licence includes every system update for as long as you're subscribed. Your system gets better, not obsolete.
You're a capable product manager, but the moment an interviewer asks you to design an AI feature or explain a model tradeoff, the answer gets vague and you can feel the score dropping. You've read the job descriptions, you know the terminology, but rattling off words like RAG or fine-tuning without a real tradeoff attached sounds exactly like what every other candidate does, and hiring managers at frontier labs have heard it hundreds of times. The AI PM role is genuinely different from a standard PM role, and most interview prep resources treat it like it isn't, so you walk in with frameworks built for 2019 and face questions built for 2025. Without knowing the actual rubric the panel uses, you're writing answers for an audience you can't see, and the rejection lands with no explanation of
What you'll be able to do, module by module
Every module leaves you able to build and run something real. Here is the syllabus, in the order you work through it.
Curriculum
9 chapters · 63 lessons
Foundations
You can name and hit all five columns on the hiring manager's scorecard, and attach a real tradeoff and a product decision to every core LLM concept, from tokens to agents, before you walk into any room.
0.1 The AI PM Scorecard2 items
- f0-1 What the Hiring Manager Is Actually Scoring🔒
- Quiz: The AI PM ScorecardQuiz
0.2 LLM and GenAI Fundamentals3 items
- f1-1 LLM Basics: Tokens, Context Window, Temperature, Hallucinations🔒
- f1-2 RAG, Fine-Tuning, RLHF/DPO, Evals, Inference, Agents🔒
- Quiz: LLM and GenAI FundamentalsQuiz
0.3 The Core Frameworks5 items
- f2-1 CIRCLES for AI Product Design🔒
- f2-2 Metrics and Estimation: North Star, Guardrails, Funnels, Diagnosis🔒
- f2-3 STAR for AI-Flavored Behavioral Stories🔒
- f2-4 Writing a PRD, Memo, or Eval Framework Under Time Pressure🔒
- Quiz: The Core FrameworksQuiz
P1: Product Sense with AI
You can scope an open-ended AI feature prompt down to one user and one problem, justify what you'd deliberately not build, and design for the failure case as fluently as the happy path.
1.1 Product Sense with AI11 items
- fp1 How to Attack a Product Sense Round🔒
- q01 Q1: Design an AI Product for a Ride-Sharing App🔒
- q02 Q2: You Have Text-to-Music Capabilities. How Would You Productize It?🔒
- q03 Q3: How Would You Improve ChatGPT for Enterprise Users?🔒
- q04 Q4: Design a RAG System for TikTok's Moderation Team🔒
- q05 Q5: Design an AI Feature for Enterprise Users of Claude🔒
- q06 Q6: Prioritize Features for an AI Writing Assistant in Word🔒
- q07 Q7: Design How Users Interact with an AI Scheduling Assistant🔒
- q08 Q8: Design an AI Agent for a Streaming Service🔒
- q09 Q9: A VC Asks You to Build an AI Career Coaching Company🔒
- Quiz: Product Sense with AIQuiz
P2: AI Technical Understanding
You can say, clearly and under pressure, which technical approach fits a given product problem and why not the alternative, without a single jargon sentence that has no tradeoff attached.
2.1 AI Technical Understanding11 items
- fp2 How to Attack a Technical Round🔒
- q10 Q10: Define Hallucinations in LLMs🔒
- q11 Q11: How Do You Handle Hallucinations in Production?🔒
- q12 Q12: What's the Effect of Adjusting Context Window Size?🔒
- q13 Q13: What Metrics Did You Use to Evaluate Your LLM's Performance?🔒
- q14 Q14: What's Your Criteria in Selecting a Model?🔒
- q15 Q15: What's Your Understanding of the RAG Framework?🔒
- q16 Q16: Are You Familiar with RLHF? What Do You Know About DPO?🔒
- q17 Q17: When Do You Use Rule-Based vs. NN vs. LLM Models?🔒
- q18 Q18: How Would You Build an LLM Inference Pipeline?🔒
- Quiz: AI Technical UnderstandingQuiz
P3: AI Strategy and Business
You can frame an AI product strategy question around real competitive and business tradeoffs, not a feature list, in a way that lands as credible senior PM thinking to an engineering-heavy panel.
3.1 AI Strategy and Business10 items
- fp3 How to Attack a Strategy Round🔒
- q19 Q19: How Do You Approach GenAI Safety in Consumer Products?🔒
- q20 Q20: A Model with 10x Capability at 10x Cost. What Do You Do?🔒
- q21 Q21: What Industry Could Benefit Most from Enterprise ChatGPT?🔒
- q22 Q22: Design Safeguards for an AI That Acts on a User's Behalf🔒
- q23 Q23: How Do You Balance Product Velocity with Safety Constraints?🔒
- q24 Q24: Capability vs. Safety on One Roadmap. Prioritize.🔒
- q25 Q25: Your Long-Term Product Vision for Anthropic, as a Roadmap🔒
- q26 Q26: What Strategies Keep a Product Defensible in an AI-Saturated Market?🔒
- Quiz: AI Strategy and BusinessQuiz
P4: Execution and Metrics
You can name a North Star metric and its guardrail in the same breath, distinguish offline evals from live product metrics, and walk an interviewer through how you'd measure an AI feature without ever landing on a vague engagement answer.
4.1 Execution and Metrics11 items
- fp4 How to Attack an Execution and Metrics Round🔒
- q27 Q27: What Goal for an AI-Only Social Network OpenAI Is Building?🔒
- q28 Q28: Measure Success for OpenAI. What If Instrumentation Went Down?🔒
- q29 Q29: You Lead the ChatGPT 6 Rollout. How Do You Launch It?🔒
- q30 Q30: Estimate the Number of ChatGPT Users Worldwide🔒
- q31 Q31: What Guardrail Metrics Would You Track? One Flags an Issue. Now What?🔒
- q32 Q32: How Do You Build Customer Trust When Launching AI Features?🔒
- q33 Q33: DAU of a Claude Feature Dropped 15% Last Week. Diagnose It.🔒
- q34 Q34: You're Meta's PM for AI Chat. Define Success and Goals.🔒
- q35 Q35: AI Sends Transcripts to All Invitees; Attendance Drops. What Now?🔒
- Quiz: Execution and MetricsQuiz
P5: Behavioral, AI-Flavored
You can answer AI-specific behavioural questions, including safety and ethics scenarios, using real examples structured around the scorecard so the interviewer hears both the story and the judgement behind it.
5.1 Behavioral, AI-Flavored10 items
- fp5 How to Attack a Behavioral Round🔒
- q36 Q36: How Have You Adopted AI in Your Workflows?🔒
- q37 Q37: Tell Me About a Time You Built an AI Product from Scratch🔒
- q38 Q38: Describe a Time Your AI Project Failed. What Did You Do?🔒
- q39 Q39: Explain a Complex AI Concept to a Non-Technical Stakeholder🔒
- q40 Q40: Why Anthropic, and What Draws You to AI Safety?🔒
- q41 Q41: What Slightly Unusual Beliefs Do You Hold? How Do You Defend Them?🔒
- q42 Q42: A Launched AI Feature Had Real Model Limits. How Did You Design the CX?🔒
- q43 Q43: Models Gave Inconsistent Predictions. How Did You Work with Scientists?🔒
- Quiz: Behavioral, AI-FlavoredQuiz
P6: Take-Home and Practical
You can produce take-home and practical assignment responses that read like the work of someone who already holds the role, hitting the five-column rubric in written form just as reliably as in a live conversation.
6.1 Take-Home and Practical9 items
- fp6 How to Attack a Take-Home Round🔒
- q44 Q44: Two Written Prompts, a 2-Pager Each, Plus a Panel Presentation🔒
- q45 Q45: Advance Case: a Written Memo or PRD Delivered as Round One🔒
- q46 Q46: Whiteboard an Eval Framework for a Generative Feature🔒
- q47 Q47: Prototype a Prompt Chain and Discuss Measuring Its Reliability🔒
- q48 Q48: Walk Through Eval Pipeline Design and Human-in-the-Loop Setup🔒
- q49 Q49: How Do You Evaluate a Prompt? (Live Practical Probe)🔒
- q50 Q50: If You Were Already a PM on This Team, What Would You Do and Why?🔒
- Program Final: Take-Home and PracticalQuiz
Hiring managers at frontier labs see hundreds of candidates who know the vocabulary and none of the tradeoffs. When you can name the guardrail metric in the same breath as the North Star, design the failure case without being prompted, and say clearly why you'd choose RAG over fine-tuning for this specific problem, you are the candidate your interviewer goes to bat for in the debrief room, and tha
From subscribing to running your first artifact
Subscribe and unlock everything immediately
The moment you subscribe you get full access to every module, framework, and worked example in the course. No waiting, no drip schedule. Open lesson one, watch what the hiring manager is literally scoring, and you already have a sharper lens than most candidates who've been preparing for weeks.
Work through the modules in order or jump to your weak spot
Each module tackles a specific pillar of the AI PM interview: product sense, technical understanding, strategy, execution, behavioural, and take-homes. If your technical confidence is the gap, go straight to P2. If you're already strong on strategy, start with Foundations to lock in the scoring framework, then pick your battles. Every lesson is self-contained, hands-on, and built around the real q
Say your first scored answer out loud before the session ends
Lesson one gives you a live exercise: pick any AI feature prompt, speak your answer for 90 seconds on a timer, and score yourself against all five columns honestly. That is the whole loop in miniature. You leave the first session knowing your baseline, knowing which columns need work, and with a concrete framework to practise every day until interview day.
Designing a safety-aware AI feature for a healthcare information product, live in an interview
State your structure first
Before answering anything, you say out loud: I'll clarify scope, pick one user and one problem, walk the technical tradeoff, name a metric and its guardrail, and close with how I'd handle it going wrong. That one sentence has already aimed at all five scorecard columns before you've said anything substantive, and the interviewer stops worrying about whether you'll ramble.
Narrow to one user and name what you won't build
You pick a specific user: a caregiver managing a parent's medications who needs accurate, cited answers, not a general wellness browser. You explicitly say you're not building a diagnosis tool, a triage assistant, or anything that acts on the user's behalf without confirmation. Saying no on purpose, in front of the interviewer, is the strongest product thinking signal in the whole answer.
Attach the right technical approach with a real tradeoff
You argue for RAG over fine-tuning: drug interaction data changes frequently, you need every answer to be citable to an approved source, and a fine-tuned model would go stale and couldn't show its working. You set temperature to near zero because confident wrong answers in a health context are expensive. One tradeoff sentence like that scores higher on AI depth than a full paragraph of jargon with nothing attached.
Name a North Star and its guardrail in the same breath
North Star is tasks completed per weekly active caregiver, defined as a medication question answered without the user leaving to verify elsewhere. Guardrail is hallucination-report rate: if a user flags an answer as wrong, that counts against the guardrail regardless of what the engagement numbers say. You know the difference between an offline eval and a live product metric, and you say so.
Design the failure case, not just the happy path
You close by explaining what happens when the model is wrong: every answer surfaces the cited source so a hallucination has somewhere to be caught, low-confidence responses are flagged visibly rather than presented as authoritative, and any query touching dosage or side effects routes a human pharmacist review prompt. That is the safety judgement column, and in a 2025 AI PM loop it can decide the whole result by itself.
The toolkit you'll build and run in this program
You leave with working assets, not notes.
Real things you can demo in an interview.
A personal five-column scorecard you can self-score after every practice answer, calibrated to the rubric real hiring managers use
A repeatable answer framework for all six AI PM question types: product sense, technical, strategy, execution, behavioural, and take-home
A worked-example library covering 50 real questions asked at leading AI companies, each with the trap identified and the strong answer modelled
A tradeoff cheat sheet covering every core technical concept from tokens to agents, framed as product decisions with real numbers attached
A take-home assignment template you can adapt to any practical round, structured to hit all five scorecard columns in written form
You'll get the most from this if
Product managers from any industry who are targeting AI PM roles at frontier labs, large tech companies, or well-funded AI startups and want to close the interview gap fast
Associate or mid-level PMs who've been told they need more technical credibility but don't have an engineering or ML background and aren't sure where to start
Senior PMs who can already handle standard product interviews but keep running into AI-specific questions on safety, evals, or model tradeoffs that knock their loop score down
Career changers and new graduates who are applying for AI PM or associate PM roles and need a structured, honest picture of what the interview actually tests
Yearly plan: 14-day keep-the-system guarantee
14-day refund on the yearly plan. Finish the first two modules, and if you haven't run your first live pipeline, take a full refund.
Straight answers before you subscribe
I don't have a technical background. Will I actually be able to follow the AI and ML content?
Yes, and that is a design choice, not a disclaimer. Every technical concept in the course is taught as a product decision first: what the tradeoff is, why it changes what you'd ship, and what a real number looks like. You're not learning to build models, you're learning to talk about them the way a hiring manager expects a PM to. The course starts from first principles in the Foundations module and builds from there. No coding, no maths, no assumed background.
Does this work if I'm applying to smaller AI companies or startups, not just the big frontier labs?
The five-column scorecard and the question frameworks in this course are grounded in the interview loops at the companies named in the curriculum. Smaller AI companies and startups run structurally similar loops because many of their interviewers came from those same companies. The tradeoff thinking, the metrics rigour, and the safety judgement dimension are valued just as highly at a Series B AI startup as they are at a frontier lab, often more so because smaller teams have less tolerance for vague thinking.
What if I start the course and it's not right for me? Is there a refund?
There is a 14-day refund window. If you go through the material and decide it isn't what you needed, contact us within 14 days of purchase and you'll get your money back. No hoops.
How does the course stay current as the AI PM interview landscape changes?
The course is updated as the curriculum evolves. When new content is added or existing lessons are revised to reflect changes in how frontier labs interview, enrolled students get access to the updated material automatically. You're not buying a snapshot, you're buying access to the course as it stands and as it improves.
Can I use the frameworks and worked examples in my actual job once I've landed the role?
Yes. Your subscription is a personal licence for your own professional use, which includes practising, preparing, and applying what you learn once you're in the role. The scorecard, the tradeoff frameworks, and the metrics rigour taught in the course are genuinely useful tools for the day-to-day work of an AI PM, not only for getting through the door.